A Bitcoin test question exposed a closed door in OpenTerminalUI 2.6. A reflection on keeping a person's question intact across private research, technical evidence, portfolios and saved answers.
Read more →
Technical context arrives in OpenTerminalUI 2.5. A reflection on the observations behind a convincing answer, the calendars hiding inside a chart, and why evidence needs a front door.
Read more →
v2.4 gives quick tasks and deeper research different models. The more revealing lesson came when the deeper model worked correctly and still needed a better job description.
Read more →
v2.3 brings news and economic observations into the comparison briefing. A live test showed that getting an answer to finish and getting a useful answer are different kinds of progress.
Read more →
The terminal can now interpret a market comparison. Building v2.2 taught us why citations, visible limits and a person willing to ask awkward questions matter more than a confident paragraph.
Read more →
A small release about a large distinction—linking to a source is not the same as checking a claim. What v2.1 taught us about evidence, live testing and the research terminal we want to build.
Read more →
The long road from a time-aware Second Brain to cross-market context, and why the most important v2.0 decision was knowing what the evidence could not yet say.
Read more →
A Second Brain should not merely collect more market information. Its purpose is to bring agents, economic context, and future technical evidence together around the questions only its user can ask.
Read more →
v1.7 closed the first arc by turning multi-currency accounting into traceable evidence—and discovering that truth also needs a usable way to be repaired.
Read more →
v1.6 turned stability into a chain of evidence: browser, cancellable AI, performance, PostgreSQL, API contract, and clean installation, completed by human eyes.
Read more →